Entitlement to repayment of the loan
Netting: unrestricted by borrowers, netting by borrowers possible. Refund claim of a loan precisely justified – Law & Law In the case of Dt. Lawyer gives the rich woman a loan to her grandson and her wife, who now live separately. There was a loan agreement of 56,242.11 (110.
From the point of view of the jurors, it is very important to demonstrate comprehensibly in such a procedure that the sums paid are loans. It was not enough that the woman was already pumping money for the two or that the two had loans with her. The repayment modalities had also not been discussed in this way.
The fact that a repayment obligation was not necessarily to be expected, would result from the fact that the educator did not want the money back until the spouses divorced. She alone was entitled to the 25,564.59 (50,000.00 DM) resulting from the action.
Lender eradication in the law of obligations
On 2.2. In 1999, my guardians signed a clause contract with me for 11,500 marks. Now my guardians are in custody and the commissioned caretaker for the asset has dissolved the loan agreement and demanded the repayment. Do I have to pay back now? Now it has become a family dispute, and suddenly we receive from my parents or legal guardian an e-mail dated 17.04.2007 with the request to repay the loan until 30.04.2007.
I have then on 24.05. In 2007 received a letter from the lawyers of my parents, with the message of the loan after? 488 III BGB, with the reason for repeated demands not to repay the loan. Can my family dissolve the loan like that? EXIT: In 2000, a loan agreement was made between me and my guardians to buy a property, which I did.
This loan should be donated at the time of eradication in 2004. QUESTION: I’m worried that my guardians might request a refund. Repayment agreement: 5000, – + 3% interest on 30.12. 05/5000, – + 3% interest (calculated from 05.04.05) and further 5000, – + 3% interest (calculated from 05.04.05) To date, no repayment has been made and the relative has not registered at all, if necessary to arrange another repayment.1 One. What can my guardians do to preserve their legacy?……
When would the loan expire? Do we as heirs have to have the possibility to get the loan back after the parents have died and after the statute of limitations? Most of my boots have real estate assets but little cash reserves. That’s why I want to give them a loan that pays interest on the annual inflation rate. Can such a loan be granted and, if so, what should be done as little as possible?
This month I had rescheduled my family’s home through my bank. What are the risks for my guardians? What special features do my guardians have to consider? Even at this stage, it is noted that the subsidiaries take over one-third of the ownership and inventory of their parent company. The repayment amount will be set in writing for the next 3 years.
The loan was never repaid to the family man. For this we received another loan in 1989 – but also without such a certificate to my ancestors. “Question Expires my parent’s claims from the loan on 31.12.2004? Begins the limitation period only when the repayment has been asserted OR must we proceed by MB / claim before 31.12.04?
Dear lawyers, my parents granted my younger son a personal loan in 2005, which has not yet been repaid. In order for the claim to be asserted in the case of succession (I am the heiress of the last deceased in my will), my legal guardians have now handed me the original document with the following contents for safekeeping: “DARLENDER AGREEMENT 13.12.2005 The marriages people of the company B 30 000.00 at the rate of 4 percentage points per year for 12 – 24 calendar months….
The legal validity of the contract, I suspect, however, because no concrete repayment date is fixed or the claims have already expired. In 1995, I borrowed EUR 2,000 from the host family for a company. This was recorded in writing and the repayment was fixed until 1998 at the latest…….
What about the statute of limitations for this loan? However, the repayments of the subsidiary have stagnated for various reasons. As a result, the repayments of the subsidiary have slowed down. Now, the subsidiary was informed by a lawyer that the guardians terminated the “loan” exceptionally and without notice (“loan” under 314 BGB), requesting the subsidiary to pay the entire balance plus a 6% interest rate within 2 calendar weeks Lawyer to refund.
However, the list is not correct at all, as only part and not all repayments have been added to the list. – An interest payment amount has never been set between daughter and mother or child. T (ochter) received in 1998 from M (utter) a donated (notarially confirmed, registered in the cadastre) Bauparzell. The following order was formulated in writing: “Agreement on a private loan between the lender (V) and the borrower (T) amounting to 400 000 marks.
The repayment amount is paid annually in the month of December under the following conditions: Contract refusal (country goes back to M), but land goes back, even if the loan is not repaid to M. After a loan cancellation with immediate repayment or foreclosure I need the following advice, I have tried to a private loan.
The agreed agency commission is to pay out the loan on payment to Ms.,,,,,,,,, by the agency service or the proof of the loan broker and a right of withdrawal according to § 315 BGB is no longer possible. Because I could not raise them, I asked my guardians to take them for me.
However, because this compensation never existed because my husband did not behave properly during the service, there was no refund. In 2001 (May), my families had a gold wedding, where there were some problems with my husband for personal reasons. The part of the “loan” has already been repaid or repaid, about 4 000 marks.
Now she demanded a total of 7,500 EUR through a lawyer because it was claimed that it was a loan and that the repayment will be made if the economic situation of my husband allows it…… so she paid her fathers a small one rental fee.
Can the ex-girlfriend of my husband after this time only say that it was a loan, although it was never really mentioned (§§ 242, 397-2, 518-2 BGB)?